retellers: (Default)
🐐🐺🐰🦊🐯🦒 ([personal profile] retellers) wrote2020-05-28 11:54 pm
Entry tags:

KING RULEBOOK


the king


On Sunday, at 6pm, Emet-Selch will receive a message on his PHS.
πŸ‘€ ➑️ 🏰

go there.

Upon receiving this message, Emet-Selch will notice that the castle appears closer than usual. Should he head towards it, he will finally be able to reach its entrance. Inside is a large hall with various doors, along with a staircase, but he will be able to access only a single door. Once he steps inside, he will find his Leader waiting for him.

After their meeting is over and he leaves the castle, he will no longer be able to reach the castle again.

ΰΌΆβ€’β”ˆβ”ˆβ›§β”ˆο½‘oΒ°βœ₯✣ γ€€γ€€ ✣βœ₯Β°oο½‘β”ˆβ›§β”ˆβ”ˆβ€’ΰΌΆ


As the King:
Every Sunday, the King will be able to create one rule and one order that must be followed. These decrees will go into effect on the Monday of the following week, and will last until the following Sunday.

The two decrees are as follows:
    1) One rule that every participant must follow, the only stipulations being that it cannot contradict any of the current rules and that you cannot consecutively make the same rule. This rule will be added to the official rulebook, and anyone who breaks it will be punished.

    2) One order that one participant must follow. The participant will not be informed that an order has been given to them, and will only be aware of an urge to obey it. The participant will follow this order until the new week begins, or until the King chooses to remove it.

ΰΌΆβ€’β”ˆβ”ˆβ›§β”ˆο½‘oΒ°βœ₯✣ γ€€γ€€ ✣βœ₯Β°oο½‘β”ˆβ›§β”ˆβ”ˆβ€’ΰΌΆ


Additional notes:
The King will be allowed to ask questions about the on-goings of the game and communicate with their Leader in their weekly meetings. They may receive small hints should they perform well. However, the information received will be up to their Leader's discretion.




NAVIGATION

locations β‚“Λš. statuses *+:q ic profiles :β‚“o ic rules ο½₯゚゚ο½₯q audience requests
murder proposals q✧o private conversations ο½₯゚oq curfew ο½₯゚✧ memories

arkitect: (25)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-04 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
[that gets a raised brow, as he pulls the phs out and glances down to it. upon opening the app, he takes a minute to read it over, before looking back up to tiger.]

...How interesting. And was this yet another decision made for you, or yours, this time?

[again, who the hell decided to let emet-selch make rules i am mclosing it over this]
arkitect: (20)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-04 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
What a surprise, that you of all people would be tied to those without the temperament to come and be social.

[maybe a slight hint of amusement, there. is this just what comes of being the 'i don't want to get to know you' type, tiger...]

I should like to clarify a thing or two about these rules, however.
arkitect: (12)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-04 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)
By 'every participant', am I to take it that I will be bound to any I make as well?
arkitect: (15)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-04 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
How convenient.

[good thing he's used to acting.]

Then, about the inability to contradict current rules-- if they are subject to change, what of a situation in which they change to contradict one I have put in place? The rules of this place take precedence?
arkitect: (46)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-04 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, as long as it is not simply overruled and lost, I can work with that.

[it's an acceptable tradeoff.]

And there are truly no stipulations on what can be given to another participant?
arkitect: (44)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-04 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Less effective to give one they would truly balk at following, then...

[hm. he's going to have to take that into consideration, when deciding.]

When must the decision be made-- before leaving here?
arkitect: (Default)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-04 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
While I consider, then, we may as well speak. As I said, I had intended to call on you myself.

[he's not just going to yeet them out without thought.]

It was not originally among my questions, but now I do have to ask- I don't suppose you can say roughly how many of your own participants you have met? No numbers necessary, really, it would be satisfactory enough to leave it at something like 'most' or 'few'.

[he's mildly curious after what tiger said earlier.]
arkitect: (15)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-04 11:43 pm (UTC)(link)
It could certainly be worse.

[a slight hum as he settles in a bit more, slouchy as ever.]

What I primarily wished to speak about was a conversation I had with Virid, last night.
arkitect: (58)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-05 12:58 am (UTC)(link)
'The kid' claimed the competition not to have been his initial motivation. That he was asked for help, and agreed to lend his assistance.

I thought I might ask what you knew of such claims, or at the least, what you made of it.

[not ruling out a lack of knowledge, but either way, worth bringing up the topic.]
arkitect: (25)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-05 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
He refused to say who, but implied it could be guessed at-- which I took to mean one of you, as well. Likeliest to be the one he is tied to, but perhaps not a necessity.

[considering what he said about agreeing with their reasoning and what tiger said about not all of them being likely to listen about not getting cozy with other teams, it doesn't have to have been his own.]

He did mention it being justice for them.
arkitect: (17)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-05 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
That, I could not say. He was willing to answer some of my questions, but not to speak at much length about it.
arkitect: (12)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-05 02:35 am (UTC)(link)
It is entirely possible. By the nature of this arrangement, it would be to their benefit not to let on that they do.

[he already intended to try to learn more of them-- that much hasn't changed.]

If it was one of your coworkers, then perhaps something may be writ to make it harder to do the same again-- although it would be difficult to do so without affecting you, as well.

[emet-selch doesn't care for the competition aspect, but the whole situation really was a pain.

he is absolutely not nice enough to attempt to ban murder, though.]
arkitect: (14)

[personal profile] arkitect 2020-10-05 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)
It is usually best to keep the bar low, though I do find it is often not low enough.

[they can absolutely agree on that part.]

So if this Realm is influenced enough by such actions, the proceedings may be altered by them as well?

[because that's-- troubling, actually, his brow furrowing.]

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-05 20:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-05 22:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-06 02:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-06 03:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-06 05:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-06 05:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-06 06:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-06 17:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-06 18:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-07 05:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-07 16:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-08 00:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arkitect - 2020-10-08 06:03 (UTC) - Expand